In the early 2000s, many reverse transcriptase inhibitors (HIV treatment drugs) came about and gave new found hope to HIV-diagnosed and HIV at-risk patients. Truvada, which was approved as an HIV treatment in 2004, set its own mark in the HIV prescription game.
Today, Truvada is the most notorious HIV drug on the market. People who have been diagnosed with HIV have looked to the drug as a saving grace; that is, before patients came forward after developing serious and life-threatening health complications linked to Truvada’s active ingredient tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF).
Those who have already taken the HIV treatment drug and have since developed concerning conditions should take legal action against the Gilead company immediately.
Call the trusted Chicago Truvada lawsuit attorneys of Onder Law Firm at (314) 310-7924 for a no-cost, zero-obligation case consultation today.
Although the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) and acquired immunodeficiency virus(AIDS) are not curable, HIV treatment drugs have been very helpful in the overall treatment and prevention of the virus.
Nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTIs) are used to prevent the replication of infected HIV cells.These drugs are extremely strong and effective in controlling the virus.
HIV-diagnosed patients can treat the virus with Truvada, which consists of the drugs embicitrane and tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF). This once daily pill should be used in combination with other NRTIs or as recommended by a patient’s physician.
Gilead Sciences Inc. lists the most common side effects of Truvada as the following:
Those who take Truvada can increase their risks of certain life-threatening injuries. Users can face serious illness and even death if they fall victim to HIV treatment-related concerns like chronic kidney disease and bone demineralization
Truvada users who have a history of kidney conditions can be at an increased risk for chronic kidney disease or even total kidney failure. Symptoms of this kidney failure include:
Mineral loss in the bones is another serious condition which can occur after taking Truvada. Lookout for the following signs of bone demineralization:
TDF, or tenofovir disoproxil fumarate, is a key NRTI in Truvada. Evidence that TDF contributes to serious and life-threatening health conditions emerged after patients began to come forward with their injuries.
Gilead Sciences Inc. became widely successful in part of its TDF-based drugs, including Truvada. The company now faces many lawsuits for manufacturing these defective products and failing to inform the public of the drug’s toxicity.
It is estimated that the company had knowledge of a safer alternative to TDF as early as the year 2000, yet the company continued to sell the same dangerous formula to patients. Both personal injury and class action lawsuits have been brought against Gilead before California civil court.
Thousands of patients were left to suffer bone and kidney damages among other injuries. Meanwhile, Gilead was profiting billions of dollars in annual revenue.
If you have used Truvada in the past and have suffered any of the associated health complications, know that you can pursue compensation through a product liability claim with the help of skilled attorneys from Onder Law Firm.
The Chicago Department of Public Health’s Specialty Clinics provide sexually transmitted infection (STI) screenings, even if you do not have health insurance.
Although the state of Chicago does rank relatively higher up in the percentage of HIV diagnoses per population, they are experiencing record lows in the span of 26 years. Local public health officials that monitor sexual wellness say that the Affordable Care Act and increase in access to treatment has led to such progress.
The latest statistics reveal that state of Chicago currently has 19,704 individuals living with HIV:
Certain populations are at higher risk of contracting HIV. The 2017 yearly statistics from the state of Chicago do align with the national average, where a majority of HIV-diagnosed parties are men who have sex with men and members of minority groups, including black and hispanic groups.
As of 2017, 171 individuals diagnosed with HIV passed away. That same year, there were 743 new cases of HIV that were diagnosed.
Back in 2016, 80 percent of all HIV-diagnosed individuals had been linked to HIV medical care within a single month of diagnosis. A year after diagnosis, this value progressed to 92 percent. From 2015 to 2016, 48 percent of those diagnosed were virally suppressed.
As things are looking positive for the state in terms of declining HIV diagnoses, much can be attributed to taking HIV treatment. These HIV diagnosed and at-risk groups, however, may be taking the antiretroviral Truvada. Those suppressing the virus with this dangerous ingredient should ask their doctor if it is safe for them to do so, or what other options are available.
TDF drug lawsuits, both personal and class action, that began in California have gained momentum and called attention to the negligent acts of Gilead Sciences.
The main difference between personal and a class action litigation is that in a class action lawsuit many victims with similar circumstances are gathered to be represented under a single claim. Through this method, an attorney can use a pool of investigative methods and evidence gathered to hold a defendant accountable, but the value of your claim runs the risk of being undercut.
The Truvada class action lawsuits allege that the pharmaceutical company acted in a negligent way by holding a monopoly over a dangerous product while withholding the safer alternative to TDF until 2015 when the patent was set to expire.
Procedures are very different in a personal injury lawsuit where only one victim is represented by a single attorney. Such cases give special attention to your unique circumstances and how the defendant brought harm upon you, specifically.
By pursuing a product liability claim against the Gilead company, you can recover damages for the injuries which the drug has caused you. No two victims will have the same exact variables in their case. It is essential that your case receives the necessary attention that can help to optimize the amount of compensation you recover from the negligent drug providers.
If you have begun to experience severe health complications after taking TDF-based Truvada for HIV treatment, you should consult with your physician to discontinue use or seek alternative HIV treatment. Then, when you are ready to do so, take legal action against the company which has brought you harm.
In order to file a claim, your circumstances must qualify. A helpful Truvada attorney from Onder Law Firm can provide a FREE, no-obligation case review.
The following qualifications can determine if you have an eligible Truvada pharmaceutical injury claim:
If these conditions apply to your situation, then you should definitely seek the attention of an experienced Truvada attorney. Gilead profited billions upon billions of dollars every single year while causing damages to the lives of HIV-diagnosed persons.
Given that the defendant is such a huge pharmaceutical name in this case, you will need the expert legal guidance of diligent Truvada lawsuit attorneys. Both the company and their insurance company will not relent without a fight.
Although alternate options can include filing on one’s own or filing in a class action lawsuit, we assure you that a personal product liability claim is the most secure way of acquiring fair and deserved compensation.
You need someone who can conduct thorough investigative work and easily represent your case before a court. If you wish to pursue optimal damages, then you need the best legal team for the job.
Victims of Truvada or TDF-related injuries must hold the negligent Gilead company liable and pursue damages against them. Contact our dedicated Chicago Truvada lawsuit attorneys of Onder Law Firm at (314) 310-7924 for your cost-FREE consultation today.
This web site is designed for general information only. The information presented at this site should not be construed to be formal legal advice nor the formation of a lawyer/client relationship. The choice of a lawyer is an important decision and should not be based solely upon advertisements. Past results afford no guarantee of future results. Every case is different and must be judged on its own merits. Results include Co-lead counsel on Yaz MDL & co-liaison leadership role in Pradaxa MDL.